Exploring Artistic Expression in Student Visual Works Among Different Specialties: A Comparative Study with Educational Insights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v19i1.1199Keywords:
artistic creativity, higher education, student visual works, creative dimensions, specialization differencesAbstract
This study investigates artistic creativity in university students across six academic specialties – Fine Arts, Technical/Analytical, Pedagogy, Humanities, Psychology, and Physical Culture – using a seven-dimensional framework: Stylistic Coherence, Symbolic Saturation, Narrative Integration, Emotional Expressiveness, Authorial Presence, Aesthetic Orientation, and Aesthetic Intentionality. A total of 147 students (ages 17–24, 78% female) completed a creative task, and their works were analyzed via MANOVA and post-hoc comparisons. Results indicate that Fine Arts and Technical/Analytical students exhibit the most pronounced creative profiles, particularly in expressive, symbolic, and intentional dimensions, while other groups display moderate but balanced creativity. The findings demonstrate that specialization systematically shapes creative expression and reflects distinct perceptive – cognitive strategies underlying artistic production. Creativity, therefore, appears not only as an individual disposition but as a context-dependent process influenced by domain-specific training. These results support the use of differentiated pedagogical approaches that combine general cognitive development with orientation-specific artistic practice. The study confirms the multidimensional nature of creativity and its educational malleability. Limitations include unequal group sizes, a single-institution sample, and a cross-sectional design. Future research should incorporate longitudinal approaches and additional psychological and socio-cultural variables to better understand the developmental trajectories and practical outcomes of creative profiles.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Psychological Thought (PSYCT) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in PSYCT in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of PSYCT are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, PSYCT as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by PSYCT.
Authors grant PSYCT the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
