ACADEMIC FUNCTIONAL DISENGAGEMENT AS A DISTINCT ACADEMIC CONSTRUCT WITH DEFINED BOUNDARIES AND AN EMPIRICAL VERIFICATION PROGRAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v19i1.1240Keywords:
academic, functional, disengagement, student, engagement, construct, differentiation, nomological, network, incremental, validityAbstract
This conceptual article introduces and defines Academic Functional Disengagement (AFD) as a distinct academic construct describing a specific pattern of selective and resource-organized participation in learning activities. The existing literature on student engagement, academic disengagement, amotivation, burnout, procrastination, and related phenomena offers rich but partially overlapping explanatory frameworks that do not adequately capture cases of intentional restriction of participation without full withdrawal, demotivation, or syndromic exhaustion. The article proposes a clear conceptual definition of AFD, formulates necessary and sufficient criteria, and delineates its boundaries in relation to closely related constructs. Through systematic differentiation and the construction of a nomological network, the article argues for the independent status of AFD within academic psychology. A coherent program for operationalization and empirical verification is presented, including a plan for testing construct, discriminant, and incremental validity. Particular attention is given to distinguishing AFD from popular descriptive labels such as quiet quitting, which lack the required conceptual and measurement precision. The article concludes by specifying criteria for empirical support or falsification of the proposed construct and by outlining directions for future research.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Psychological Thought (PSYCT) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in PSYCT in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of PSYCT are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, PSYCT as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by PSYCT.
Authors grant PSYCT the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
