A Neglected Drama for Elders: Discrepancy Between Self-Perception and Objective Performance Regarding Financial Capacity in Patients With Cognitive Deficits

Authors

  • Vaitsa Giannouli School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Magda Tsolaki School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v8i2.130

Keywords:

elders, financial capacity, incapacity, neuropsychological assessment, dementia, public opinion

Abstract

The article aims at investigating whether patients from Greece with different kinds of cognitive deficits (resulting from Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease Dementia, and Mild Cognitive Impairment) can be characterized as financially capable (based on neuropsychological assessment), and if this claimed (in)capacity is in accordance with their personal belief of (in)capacity. Results revealed that the vast majority of the mild, moderate and severe Alzheimer’s disease patients as well as patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Parkinson’s disease, who scored significantly lower than normal on a relevant financial decision-making capacity test, believed that they were capable to handle their finances. This finding is in contrast with their actual financial capacity scores and the beliefs of their family members-caregivers on this issue. Some critical questions concerning incapacity and intellectual insight are raised, and future cross-cultural investigative attempts on this issue are suggested.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Research Articles

License

Authors who publish with Psychological Thought (PSYCT) agree to the following terms:

Creative Commons License

Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in PSYCT in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of PSYCT are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, PSYCT as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).

Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by PSYCT.

Authors grant PSYCT the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.